| No. | Condition Text |
|---|
| 1. | The proposed development is considered not to be in accordance with the provisions of Schedule 2, Part 1, Class F of the Town and Country Planning (General Permitted Development) Order 2015 and it is therefore recommended that a Certificate of Lawfulness be refused in this instance. Lack of sufficient evidence has been provided to conclude the hardstanding would be a permeable or porous area. |
| 2. | The proposed development is considered not to be in accordance with the provisions of Schedule 2, Part 1, Class A of the Town and Country Planning (General Permitted Development) Order 2015 and it is therefore recommended that a Certificate of Lawfulness be refused in this instance. The height of the raised patio when measured from the ground would be more than 0.3m (A.1(k)). |
| 3. | The proposed development is considered not to be in accordance with the provisions of Schedule 2, Part 2, Class A of the Town and Country Planning (General Permitted Development) Order 2015 and it is therefore recommended that a Certificate of Lawfulness be refused in this instance. The height of the fence when measured from the ground would be more than 2m (A.1(b)). |
