| No. | Condition Text |
|---|
| 1. | The layout of the development is inadequate, as one double bedroom for each of the two bedroom, four person flats has an area of 10m², which does not meet the 11.5m² in line with the DCLG Technical Housing Standards.Therefore, the proposed layout of the development would be inadequate resulting in substandard accommodation for future residents through lack of internal space. Consequently, under the provisions of Town and Country Planning (General Permitted Development)(England) Order 2020 [as amended], the prior approval of the Local Planning Authority is refused. |
| 2. | In the absence of a detailed Daylight and Sunlight Assessment, the large areas of the habitable rooms of the proposed flats would not receive adequate daylight and sunlight. Consequently, under the provisions of Town and Country Planning (General Permitted Development)(England) Order 2020 [as amended], the prior approval of the Local Planning Authority is refused. |
| 3. | The proposed development is of a poor design and the addition of two storeys would give rise to a top heavy appearance, which would be unacceptable. In addition, the proposed development would, by reason of its excessive height, scale, bulk and mass, appear dominant, visually intrusive, incongruous and out of character in the streetscene and in the surrounding area. Consequently, under the provisions of Town and Country Planning (General Permitted Development)(England) Order 2020 [as amended], the prior approval of the Local Planning Authority is refused. |
| 4. | Introducing such a high building in such close proximity to neighbouring dwellings and gardens in Medora Road that would fill their view, would provide a "wall of development" which will give rise to an uncomfortable overbearing effect and sense of enclosure that would be oppressive and result in a significant loss of amenity, including loss of outlook. The proposed development would result in a loss of amenity, including a loss of outlook to No.'s 1-12 Romside Place and 25-33 Romside Place. Consequently, under the provisions of Town and Country Planning (General Permitted Development)(England) Order 2020 [as amended], the prior approval of the Local Planning Authority is refused. |
| 5. | In the absence of a legal agreement to prevent future occupants from applying for or obtaining a residents parking permit, the proposal fails to satisfactorily mitigate the parking impacts of the development. Consequently, under the provisions of Town and Country Planning (General Permitted Development)(England) Order 2020 [as amended], the prior approval of the Local Planning Authority is refused. |
| 6. | Drawing numbers:
EX-P001 Revision A - Photos location
EX-L001 Revision A - Existing OS Map and Location Plan
EX-P001 Revision A - Existing Ground Floor Plan
EX-P002 Revision A - Existing First Floor Plan
EX-P002 Revision A - Existing Second Floor Plan
EX-P004 Revision A - Existing Roof Plan
EX-E001 Revision A - Existing Front Elevations
EX-E002 Revision A - Existing Rear Elevation
EX-E003 Revision A - Existing Side Elevation 1
EX-E004 Revision A - Existing Side Elevation 2
EX-S001 Revision A - Existing Section AA
EX-S002 Revision A - Existing Section BB
EX-E005 Revision A - Existing 3D View
PR-L001 Revision A - Proposed OS Map and Location Plan
PR-P001 Revision A - Proposed Ground Floor Plan
PR-P002 Revision A - Proposed First Floor Plan
PR-P002 Revision A - Proposed Second Floor Plan
PR-P002 Revision A - Proposed Third Floor Plan
PR-P002 Revision A - Proposed Fourth Floor Plan
PR-P007 Revision A - Proposed Roof Plan
PR-E001 Revision A - Proposed Side Elevation 1
PR-E002 Revision A - Proposed Side Elevation 2
PR-E003 Revision A - Proposed Front Elevation
PR-E004 Revision A - Proposed Rear Elevation 2
PR-S001 Revision A - Proposed Section AA
PR-S002 Revision A - Proposed Section BB
PR-D001 Revision A - Refuse Storage
PR-D002 Revision A - Bike Park Detail
PR-E005 Revision A - Proposed 3D View |
