| No. | Condition Text |
|---|
| 1. | The proposed telecommunications mast would, by reason of its siting, height and appearance, appear as a dominant and visually intrusive feature in the street scene, harmful to the visual amenities of the area contrary to Policies DC61 and DC64 of the LDF Core Strategy and Development Plan Policies Development Plan Document. |
| 2. | The siting of the proposed cabinet would be such that it would form an obstruction for pedestrian flow over the railway footbridge, harmful to general pedestrian safety and thus contrary to Policy DC34 of the Core Strategy and Development Plan Policies Development Plan Document. |
| 3. | Statement Required by Article 31 (cc) of the Town and Country Planning (Development Management) Order 2010: Consideration was given to seeking amendments, but given conflict with adopted planning policy, notification of intended refusal, rather than negotiation, was in this case appropriate in accordance with para 186-187 of the National Planning Policy Framework 2012. |
