| No. | Condition Text |
|---|
| 1. | This prior approval application requires the display of notices under sub-paragraph A.3(6), and as this could not be undertaken within the 56-day timeframe, and that an amended deadline could not be agreed, this application for prior approval cannot be considered with the requisite attention. In this situation, and in line with advice letters from the Ministry for Housing, Communities and Local Government dated March 2020, prior approval is refused. |
| 2. | The proposed telecommunications apparatus would - by reason of its siting and appearance - appear as a dominant and visually intrusive feature, and would be harmful to the amenity of the area and contrary to paragraphs 113-115 and 124-130 of the National Planning Policy Framework 2019, policies 7.4, 7.5 and 7.6 of the London Plan (MALP 2016), and policies DC61 and DC64 of the Havering Core Strategy and Development Control Policies DPD 2008. |
| 3. | The proposed telecommunications apparatus would - by reason of its siting and appearance - result in a proliferation of telecommunication equipment in this area, and would be harmful to the amenity of the area and contrary to paragraphs 113-115 and 124-130 of the National Planning Policy Framework 2019, policies 7.4, 7.5 and 7.6 of the London Plan (MALP 2016), and policies DC61 and DC64 of the Havering Core Strategy and Development Control Policies DPD 2008. |
| 4. | The Town and Country Planning (General Permitted Development)(England) Order 2015 [as amended] makes the provision that some minor amendments could be made on an application submitted under Schedule 2, Part 16, Class A. Consideration was given to seeking amendments, but the development was considered unacceptable on its own merits, and any required changes could not have been provided within the timeframe of this application. |
