| No. | Condition Text |
|---|---|
| 1. | The proposed development would, by reason of the increased height and prominent siting of the replacement mast, result in a visually obtrusive and overbearing feature which would lack sufficient screening so as to mitigate its visual impact. In addition the increase in the footprint of the base station as a result of the additional cabinet, would result in a cluttered visual aesthetic detrimental to the existing street-scene. The proposal is therefore contrary to Policies DC61 and DC64 of the LDF Core Strategy and Development Plan Policies Development Plan Document. |
| 2. | Statement Required by Article 31 (cc) of the Town and Country Planning (Development Management) Order 2010: Consideration was given to seeking amendments, but given conflict with adopted planning policy, notification of intended refusal, rather than negotiation, was in this case appropriate in accordance with para 186-187 of the National Planning Policy Framework 2012. |
