| No. | Condition Text |
|---|
| 1. | It is considered that the proposal would by virtue of its design, scale and mass would appear dominant and visually intrusive in the street scene and rear garden environment contrary to policy DC61 of the Adopted Havering Core Strategy and Development Control Policies DPD 2008 and the Adopted Havering Residential Extensions and Alterations SPD 2011. |
| 2. | The rear extensions would, by reason of their excessive scale, siting and position close to the boundary shared with No. 69 Bruce Avenue and proposed north west facing window, be unneighbourly which would give rise to an uncomfortable overbearing effect and sense of enclosure, loss of outlook, loss of privacy and be harmful to the amenity of No. 69 Bruce Avenue contrary to policy DC61 of the Adopted Havering Core Strategy and Development Control Policies DPD 2008 and the Adopted Havering Residential Extensions and Alterations SPD 2011 |
| 3. | Statement Required by Article 35 (2) of the Town and Country Planning (Development Management Procedure) (England) Order 2015: Consideration was given to seeking amendments, but given conflict with adopted planning policy, notification of intended refusal and the reason(s) for it are given via email to Mr Liberace on 13-03-19 |
