| No. | Condition Text |
|---|
| 1. | The proposed development would, by reason of its position and first floor bedroom window on its eastern flank, result in undue overlooking and loss of privacy to No.'s 34 and 36 Dagenham Road, including their rear gardens, which would have a serious and adverse effect on the living conditions of adjacent occupiers, contrary to Policy DC61 of the LDF Core Strategy and Development Control Policies DPD. |
| 2. | The proposal would, provide insufficient and inadequate provision for off-street parking, resulting in increased parking congestion in surrounding streets, contrary to Policies DC32 and DC33 of the LDF Core Strategy and Development Control Policies DPD, Policy 6.13 of the London Plan and the guidance contained in the National Planning Policy Framework. |
| 3. | In the absence of a legal agreement to secure contributions towards the demand for school places arising from the development, the proposal fails to satisfactorily mitigate the infrastructure impact of the development, contrary to the provisions of Policies DC29 and DC72 of the Development Control Policies DPD and Policy 8.2 of the London Plan. |
| 4. | Statement Required by Article 35 (2) of the Town and Country Planning (Development Management Procedure) (England) Order 2015: Consideration was given to seeking amendments, but given conflict with adopted planning policy, notification of intended refusal and the reason(s) for it was given to Mr Pallet via email on 16th March 2017. |
| 5. | The proposal, if granted planning permission on appeal, would be liable for the Mayor of London Community Infrastructure Levy (CIL). Based upon the information supplied with the application, the CIL payable would be £1,280 (this figure may go up or down, subject to indexation). Further details with regard to CIL are available from the Council's website. |
