| No. | Condition Text |
|---|
| 1. | The proposed dwelling, by way of its scale, bulk, mass and prominent position within the street-scene would appear as an unduly cramped and uncharacteristically narrow feature, to
the detriment of the character and appearance of the surrounding area and thereby contrary to Policy DC61 of the Development Control Policies DPD. Amongst other matters, this policy states that new development should respond to distinctive local building forms and patterns of development and should complement or improve the amenity and character of an area. |
| 2. | In the absence of a legal agreement to secure contributions towards the demand for school places arising from the development, the proposal fails to satisfactorily mitigate the infrastructure impact of the development, contrary to the provisions of Policies DC29 and DC72 of the Development Control Policies DPD and Policy 8.2 of the London Plan. |
| 3. | Statement Required by Article 35 (2) of the Town and Country Planning (Development Management Procedure) (England) Order 2015: Consideration was given to seeking amendments, but given conflict with adopted planning policy, notification of intended refusal and the reason(s) for it was given to the applicant in writing 25-04-2018 |
| 4. | The proposal, if granted planning permission on appeal, would be liable for the Mayor of London Community Infrastructure Levy (CIL). Based upon the information supplied with the application, the CIL payable would be £900. Further details with regard to CIL are available from the Council's website. |
