| No. | Condition Text |
|---|---|
| 1. | The proposed development would, by reason of its size, design and appearance, result in unsympathetic, visually intrusive development which would be detrimental to the architectural significance of this exhibition house and would therefore fail to preserve or enhance the special character of this part of the Conservation Area contrary to Policies DC61 and DC68 of the LDF Core Strategy and Development Control Policies DPD and the guidance in the National Planning Policy Framework. |
| 2. | Statement Required by Article 35 (2) of the Town and Country Planning (Development Management Procedure) (England) Order 2015: In accordance with para 186-187 of the National Planning Policy Framework 2012, improvements required to make the proposal acceptable were negotiated with Terry White via email on 06/04/18. The revisions involved amending the extension to the rear of No.6 in order to ensure it was more akin to a conservatory. The applicant failed to achieve the suggested revisions. |
