| No. | Condition Text |
|---|
| 1. | The proposed dwellings would appear as an incongruous form of development within the rear garden environment, entirely out of character with the surrounding environment and therefore harmful to local character and detrimental to neighbouring residential amenity, contrary to Policy DC61 of the LDF Core Strategy and Development Control Policies DPD. |
| 2. | The proposed development would have an unacceptable impact on the amenity of the occupiers of adjacent premises, due to the relationship of the access to those properties and presence of flank windows/access. The development proposals are reliant on alterations to adjacent properties which fall outside of the application site and therefore as submitted are contrary to Policy DC61 of the LDF Core Strategy and Development Control Policies DPD. |
| 3. | In the absence of a legal agreement to secure contributions towards the demand for school places arising from the development, the proposal fails to satisfactorily mitigate the infrastructure impact of the development, contrary to the provisions of Policies DC29 and DC72 of the Development Control Policies DPD and Policy 8.2 of the London Plan. |
| 4. | Statement Required by Article 35 (2) of the Town and Country Planning (Development Management Procedure) (England) Order 2015: Consideration was given to seeking amendments, but given conflict with adopted planning policy, notification of intended refusal and the reasons for it were given to the agent in writing 03-04-2018 |
| 5. | The proposal, if granted planning permission on appeal, would be liable for the Mayor of London Community Infrastructure Levy (CIL). Based upon the information supplied with the application, the CIL payable would be £2800. Further details with regard to CIL are available from the Council's website. |
