| No. | Condition Text |
|---|---|
| 1. | The proposed hip-to-gable roof extension along with a full width rear dormer in terms of their scale, siting, massing and design would appear as a dominant and visually intrusive feature on the host property, as well as unbalancing the appearance of this semi-detached pair, to the detriment of the visual amenity of the streetscene and locality. As such, the proposal is contrary to Policies 7 & 26 of the Havering Local Plan and the Council's Residential Extensions and Alterations SPD (2011). |
| 2. | Statement Required by Article 35 (2) of the Town and Country Planning (Development Management Procedure) (England) Order 2015: Consideration was given to seeking amendments, but given conflict with adopted planning policy and as no amendments were identified that could overcome the adverse impacts of the development the application has proceeded to be determined as submitted. |
