No. | Condition Text |
---|---|
1. | The outbuilding by reason of its size, bulk and mass, and the adverse cumulative impact with the existing outbuilding to the west of the site would appear as an overly dominant, incongruous and visually intrusive feature not subordinate in scale to the existing dwelling and impair the visual amenity of the site and locality. contrary to Policy 7 of the Local Plan and the Residential Extensions and Alterations Supplementary Planning Document (2011). |
2. | Statement Required by Article 35 (2) of the Town and Country Planning (Development Management Procedure) (England) Order 2015: Consideration was given to seeking amendments, but given conflict with adopted planning policy, notification of intended refusal and the reason(s) for it was given to the agent via e-mail. |