| No. | Condition Text |
|---|
| 1. | The original dwelling has a gross internal floor space of 88 square metres, which fails to meet the standard of 120 square metres contrary to Policy 8 of the Havering Local Plan. The proposal would therefore have an adverse impact on the supply of family housing within the Borough, the loss of which is not adequately justified and which could set an undesirable precedent for similar development in the locality. |
| 2. | The proposal would result in an intensification of activity at the site and result in significant harm to residential amenity from noise, disturbance and activity, where comings and goings are likely to be particularly noticeable given the nature of the residential location contrary to Policies 7 and 8 of the Havering Local Plan. |
| 3. | The proposals fail to demonstrate adequate levels of off-street parking. The nature of the HMO use by unrelated occupants combined with the level of occupancy is considered likely to lead to increased vehicle ownership and overspill which would contribute unacceptably to existing levels of parking stress and limited on-street spaces within the locality to the detriment of the amenity of surrounding occupiers. The absence of any compelling evidence otherwise, such as a parking stress survey, means that it has not been demonstrated that there would not be conflict with Policy 8(iv), London Plan T6 and paragraph 116 of the National Planning Policy Framework. |
| 4. | This application is subject to a Planning Enforcement investigation and given the refusal of this application formal enforcement action may therefore be taken. |
| 5. | Statement Required by Article 35 (2) of the Town and Country Planning (Development Management Procedure) (England) Order 2015: Consideration was given to seeking amendments, but given conflict with adopted planning policy and as no amendments were identified that could overcome the adverse impacts of the development the application has proceeded to be determined as submitted. |
