| No. | Condition Text |
|---|
| 1. | The principle of sub-dividing the application site in order to create two dwellings is considered unacceptable because it would result in narrow plot widths and a cramped form of development that would appear as a visually intrusive feature within the streetscene, harmful to the established local pattern of development and visual amenity of Front Lane, contrary to Local Plan Policies 7 and 26. |
| 2. | The proposed dwellings would, by reason of their roof design, appear as a visually intrusive feature within the street and rear garden scene and would therefore be harmful to the character and appearance of the surrounding area, contrary to Local Plan Policies 7 and 26. |
| 3. | The proposed dwellings would, by reason of their bulk, scale, mass and projection beyond the neighbouring property no. 121 Front Lane, appear as an unacceptably dominant and an intrusive unneighbourly development when viewed from this neighbouring property's rear garden environment and would therefore have an adverse impact on their amenity, contrary to Local Plan Policy 7. |
| 4. | The proposed dwellings would, by reason of their proximity to the boundaries of the neighbouring property no. 27 Marlborough Close, would give rise to an intrusive and unneighbourly form of development that would result in harm to the amenity of these neighbouring occupiers by way of overbearing impact, sense of enclosure, loss privacy and overlooking, contrary to the provisions of Local Plan Policy 7. |
| 5. | In the event that this application is allowed through the appeals process, the proposals would be liable for the following CIL contributions:
Mayoral CIL (MCIL2) contribution of £3,100 (x £25 per sqm).
Havering CIL (HCIL) contribution of £15,500 (x £125 per sqm)
Each contribution would be subject to indexation. |
| 6. | Statement Required by Article 35 (2) of the Town and Country Planning (Development Management Procedure) (England) Order 2015: Consideration was given to seeking amendments, but given conflict with adopted planning policy, notification of intended refusal was given to the agent via email on 29/06/2023. |
