| No. | Condition Text |
|---|
| 1. | The height, scale, bulk and mass of the replacement dwelling and its position forward of the front building lines of the neighbouring dwellings, would appear dominant and visually intrusive in the streetscene harmful to the open and spacious character and appearance of the surrounding area contrary to the Emerson Park Policy Area SPD and Policy DC61 of the LDF Core Strategy and Development Control Policies DPD. |
| 2. | The proposed development would, by reason of its height and bulk, forward projection and position close to the boundaries of the site, appear as a dominant and visually intrusive feature harmful to the amenity of the occupier at No. 53 Ernest Road contrary to Policy DC61 of the LDF Core Strategy and Development Control Policies DPD. |
| 3. | Statement Required by Article 35 (2) of the Town and Country Planning (Development Management Procedure) (England) Order 2015: Consideration was given to seeking amendments, but given conflict with adopted planning policy, notification of intended refusal and the reason(s) for it was given to the agent via email on 14/04/16. |
| 4. | The proposal, if granted planning permission on appeal, would be liable for the Mayor of London Community Infrastructure Levy (CIL). Based upon the information supplied with the application, the CIL payable would be £7000. Further details with regard to CIL are available from the Council's website. |
