OcellaWeb

No.	Condition Text
1.	The proposed two storey side/rear extension, by virtue of its height, depth and proximity to the boundary with No.14 Victory Road, would negatively impact the residential amenity of these neighbouring occupiers by appearing as intrusive and overbearing. The proposal has not adequately amended to respond the reason for refusal set out in the Decision Notice for P0345.24, nor the Appeal Decision for APP/B5480/D/24/3346212. The proposed development conflicts with policies 7, 26, D1, D4 and the guidance set out in the Havering Residential Extensions and Alterations SPD (2011).
2.	Statement Required by Article 35 (2) of the Town and Country Planning (Development Management Procedure) (England) Order 2015: Consideration was given to seeking amendments, but given conflict with adopted planning policy a decision was made on the application, which will enable the applicant to exercise a right of appeal if they so wish.

No.

Condition Text

The proposed two storey side/rear extension, by virtue of its height, depth and proximity to the boundary with No.14 Victory Road, would negatively impact the residential amenity of these neighbouring occupiers by appearing as intrusive and overbearing. The proposal has not adequately amended to respond the reason for refusal set out in the Decision Notice for P0345.24, nor the Appeal Decision for APP/B5480/D/24/3346212. The proposed development conflicts with policies 7, 26, D1, D4 and the guidance set out in the Havering Residential Extensions and Alterations SPD (2011).

Statement Required by Article 35 (2) of the Town and Country Planning (Development Management Procedure) (England) Order 2015: Consideration was given to seeking amendments, but given conflict with adopted planning policy a decision was made on the application, which will enable the applicant to exercise a right of appeal if they so wish.

The London Borough Of Havering - Home page