| No. | Condition Text |
|---|
| 1. | By virtue of its scale, proximity to the rear boundaries, and prominent siting, the proposed development would fail to integrate appropriately within the existing site and would not respect the established character of the surrounding area. As such, the proposal is considered unacceptable when assessed against Policies 10 and 26 of the Havering Local Plan (2021), Policy D4 of the London Plan (2021), and the National Planning Policy Framework (NPPF). |
| 2. | The layout of the development would be inadequate resulting in substandard accommodation for future residents through insufficient overall floorspace for a 3b/4p dwelling and the development would therefore give rise to a poor quality residential environment, harmful to the amenities of the occupiers. As a result, the development would be contrary to Policy 7 of the Havering Local Plan and Policy D6 of the London Plan. |
| 3. | The proposed scale, bulk and massing along the boundaries of nearby properties would be an unneighbourly, dominant, overbearing and an oppressive development, which would adversely impact on the living conditions of adjacent occupiers especially nos. 63 and 65 Askwith Road, and surrounding area contrary to Policies 7, 10 and 26 of the Havering Local Plan 2016-2031. |
| 4. | In the absence of a parking stress survey, the inadequate width for the front and garage parking spaces due to increased use, the proposed development due to its inadequate on-site car parking provision and siting/obstruct of a nearby street light would likely result in unacceptable overspill onto surrounding roads, causing harm to highway safety and residential amenity, and contrary to Policies to Havering Local Plan Policies 23 and 24, London Plan Policies T4, T6, T6.1 and the NPPF (2021). |
| 5. | Statement Required by Article 35 (2) of the Town and Country Planning (Development Management Procedure) (England) Order 2015: Consideration was given to seeking amendments, but given conflict with adopted planning policy, notification of intended refusal and the reason(s) for it was given to Mr S Lieberman (Agent) by e-mail on 12/09/25. |
| 6. | The proposal, if granted planning permission on appeal, would be liable for the Mayor of London and Havering Community Infrastructure Levy (CIL). Based upon the information supplied with the application, the Mayoral CIL payable would be £2,250.00 based on the calculation of £25.00 per square metre and the Havering Community Infrastructure Levy (HCIL) would be a charge of £11,250.00 based on calculation of £125 per square metre. Each would be subject to indexation.
Further details with regard to CIL are available from the Council's website. |
