| No. | Condition Text |
|---|
| 1. | The proposed development by reason of its prominent rear garden location and excessive height, bulk, scale and positioning close to the boundaries of the site, would appear as an incongruous and unacceptably dominant, overbearing and visually intrusive feature harmful to the amenity of neighbouring occupiers and as a result of poor quality outdoor amenity space and layout would be detrimental to the amenity of future occupiers, thus is contrary to Policy DC61 of the LDF Core Strategy and Development Control Policies DPD and Residential Design SPD. |
| 2. | In the absence of a legal agreement to secure contributions towards the demand for school places arising from the development, the proposal fails to satisfactorily mitigate the infrastructure impact of the development, contrary to the provisions of Policies DC29 and DC72 of the Development Control Policies DPD and Policy 8.2 of the London Plan. |
| 3. | Statement Required by Article 35 (2) of the Town and Country Planning (Development Management Procedure) (England) Order 2015: Consideration was given to seeking amendments, but given conflict with adopted planning policy, notification of intended refusal and the reasons for it was given to the agent in writing 06-05-2016. |
| 4. | The proposal, if granted planning permission on appeal, would be liable for the Mayor of London Community Infrastructure Levy (CIL). Based upon the information supplied with the application, the CIL payable would be £780.00. Further details with regard to CIL are available from the Council's website. |
