| No. | Condition Text |
|---|
| 1. | The proposed rear dormer by reason of its scale, bulk, mass and would appear as an unacceptably dominant within in the rear garden environment as well as overbearing from the perspective of neighbouring properties materially harmful to the visual amenity of the surrounding area contrary to the Residential Extensions and Alterations Supplementary Planning Document, and Policies 7 and 26 of the Local Plan. |
| 2. | The proposed side dormer would represent an incongruous element within the roof scene inconsistent with the established form of development to roofs of neighbouring dwellings therefore appearing as a visually intrusive feature in the streetscene harmful to the appearance of the surrounding area contrary to contrary to the Residential Extensions and Alterations Supplementary Planning Document, and Policies 7 and 26 of the Local Plan. |
| 3. | Statement Required by Article 35 (2) of the Town and Country Planning (Development Management Procedure) (England) Order 2015: Consideration was given to seeking amendments, but given conflict with adopted planning policy, notification of intended refusal and the reason(s) for it was given to the agent via email. |
