OcellaWeb

No.	Condition Text
1.	The proposed single storey rear extension, by reason of its detailed design, materials, height, bulk and massing, would appear as an unacceptably dominant and visually intrusive feature in the rear garden environment; and harmful to the appearance of the host dwelling contrary to Policy DC61 and DC69 of the LDF Core Strategy and Development Control Policies Development Plan Document, the Residential Extensions and Alterations and Hall Lane Supplementary Planning Documents and Policy 7.4 of the London Plan.
2.	Statement Required by Article 35 (2) of the Town and Country Planning (Development Management Procedure) (England) Order 2015: Consideration was given to seeking amendments, but given conflict with adopted planning policy, notification of intended refusal and the reason(s) for it was given to Alexander Miles Architecture by e-mail on 20/06/19.

No.

Condition Text

The proposed single storey rear extension, by reason of its detailed design, materials, height, bulk and massing, would appear as an unacceptably dominant and visually intrusive feature in the rear garden environment; and harmful to the appearance of the host dwelling contrary to Policy DC61 and DC69 of the LDF Core Strategy and Development Control Policies Development Plan Document, the Residential Extensions and Alterations and Hall Lane Supplementary Planning Documents and Policy 7.4 of the London Plan.

Statement Required by Article 35 (2) of the Town and Country Planning (Development Management Procedure) (England) Order 2015: Consideration was given to seeking amendments, but given conflict with adopted planning policy, notification of intended refusal and the reason(s) for it was given to Alexander Miles Architecture by e-mail on 20/06/19.

The London Borough Of Havering - Home page