| No. | Condition Text |
|---|
| 1. | The proposed development would, by reason of the inadequacy of proposed access to the site, including the shared surface arrangement, result in an increase in vehicular movements and vehicular conflict around the site entrance, to the detriment of highway safety and causing danger to pedestrians within the site and using the footway. The proposal would be contrary to Policies DC32, DC34, DC36 and DC61 of the Local Development Framework Development Control Document. |
| 2. | In the absence of a legal agreement to secure contributions towards the demand for school places arising from the development, the proposal fails to satisfactorily mitigate the infrastructure impact of the development, contrary to the provisions of Policies DC29 and DC72 of the Development Control Policies DPD and Policy 8.2 of the London Plan. |
| 3. | The proposal, if granted planning permission on appeal, would be liable for the Mayor of London Community Infrastructure Levy (CIL). Based upon the information supplied with the application, the CIL payable would be £9,600. Further details with regard to CIL are available from the Council's website. |
| 4. | Statement Required by Article 35 (2) of the Town and Country Planning (Development Management Procedure) (England) Order 2015: During consideration by the committee, members placed different weight on the planning merits and decided to refuse planning permission. |
