| No. | Condition Text |
|---|
| 1. | The proposed development, by reason of the orientation and proximity of its bedroom windows to the proposed boundary fence along the common boundary with no. 89 Park Lane, would receive poor outlook and light. Consequently, the proposed development would fail to provide an acceptable standard of accommodation for future occupiers, contrary to paragraph 135(f) of the NPPF which requires developments to have a high standard of amenity for future users, Local Plan Policy 7 and Policy D6 of the London Plan. |
| 2. | In the event that this application is allowed through the appeals process, the proposals would be liable for the following CIL contributions:
Mayoral CIL (MCIL2) contribution of £950 (x £25 per sqm).
Havering CIL (HCIL) contribution of £4,750 (x £125 per sqm)
Each contribution would be subject to indexation. |
| 3. | Statement Required by Article 35 (2) of the Town and Country Planning (Development Management Procedure) (England) Order 2015: In accordance with paragraph 38 of the National Planning Policy Framework, improvements to the proposal were negotiated with the agent via email on 17/06/2026. The revisions involved changes to the internal layout of the proposal. Despite the amendments made, the proposal was still considered to be unacceptable and as such the application was refused. |
| 4. | The Local Planning Authority has acted positively and proactively in determining this application by assessing the proposal against all material planning considerations, including planning policies and any representations which were received. It subsequently determined to grant planning permission in accordance with the National Planning Policy requirement that applications for sustainable development are approved where possible. A detailed analysis of the scheme is set out in the report on the application prepared by officers. |
