| 1. | The proposed rear dormer by reason of its height, bulk and mass would not appear suitably subservient to the scale of the existing dwelling and the cumulative impact of the the proposed dormer, the roof of the side extension and the hip to gable roof extension would appear as a dominant and bulky feature in the immediate area. As a result the proposals would unbalance the pair of semi-detached houses, detrimental to the character and appearance of this pair of semis and the visual amenity of the streetscene and rear garden environment area contrary to Policies 7 and 26 of the Havering Local Plan and the Council's Residential Extensions and Alterations Supplementary Planning Document. |
