| No. | Condition Text |
|---|
| 1. | The proposal, by reason of the scale, bulk, height, layout of the blocks and the proximity to the site boundaries, would result in a cramped form of development which would be out of character with development in the surrounding area. Furthermore the proposed development would, by reason of its height, bulk and proximity to the boundaries of the site give rise to conditions that would prejudice the redevelopment potential of the adjoining site to the east, as well as having an adverse impact on the privacy / overlooking of the prospective occupiers of the development site to the west (Coral site) to the detriment of their amenity. The proposal would be contrary to Policy 7 and 26 of the Local Plan 2021. |
| 2. | The proposed development is of a poor quality in terms of its excessive site coverage of buildings and hard surfacing and poorly laid out amenity provision; lack of communal amenity space; single aspect units with poor light and inadequate aspect from ground floor habitable rooms (rear block) all of which would result in substandard residential accommodation and a poor living environment to the detriment of the amenity of the prospective occupiers. The proposals are contrary to the provisions of the NPPF and Policy 7 of the local plan, as well as Policy D6 of the London Plan. |
| 3. | InIn the absence of a legal agreement to secure contributions towards carbon reduction, improvements, the proposal fails to satisfactorily mitigate the infrastructure impact of the development contrary to policy 36 of the Local Plan. In the absence of a legal agreement to secure car club the proposal would fail to satisfactorily provide sufficient parking provision resulting in inconvenience for future residents and/or increased parking stress in the surrounding area contrary to policy 24 of the Local Plan. In the absence of a legal agreement to provide training and recruitment scheme for the local workforce during construction period, the proposal would be contrary to the provisions of Policy 22 Local Plan. Furthermore the absence of a satisfactorily completed legal agreement means that the provision of affordable housing and appropriate review mechanisms cannot be secured and therefore the application is also contrary to policy 4 of the Local Plan. |
| 4. | Statement Required by Article 35 (2) of the Town and Country Planning (Development Management Procedure) (England) Order 2015: In accordance with paragraph 38 of the National Planning Policy Framework, improvements required to make the proposal acceptable in a letter dated 30/07/2021 to the agent. The revisions involved reduction in the amount of the development together with the improvement to design and quality of residential accommodation. However, the applicant declined to make the suggested revisions. |
| 5. | The proposal, if granted planning permission on appeal, would be liable for the Mayor of London and Havering Community Infrastructure Levy (CIL). Based upon the information supplied with the application the proposal would provide a net increase of 950sqm of floor space. Thus the Mayoral CIL payable would be £23,750 based on the calculation of £25.00 per square metre and the Havering Community Infrastructure Levy (HCIL) would be £118,750 a charge of based on calculation of £125 per square metre. Each would be subject to indexation.
Further details with regard to CIL are available from the Council's website. |
