| No. | Condition Text |
|---|
| 1. | The proposed development would, by reason of its proximity to the boundaries of the site, design and extent of site coverage and hard surfacing, represent an excessively dense, cramped development of the site, which would be out of character with the locality and contrary to Policy DC2 and DC61 of the Development Control Policies DPD. |
| 2. | The proposed development would, by reason of its design, height and proximity to neighbouring properties, result in an overbearing relationship to neighbouring development, having an adverse impact upon residential amenity contrary to Policy DC61 of the Development Control Policies DPD. |
| 3. | The proposed development would, by reason of the inadequate on site car parking provision, result in unacceptable overspill onto the adjoining roads to the detriment of highway safety and residential amenity and contrary to Policy DC2 of the Development Control Policies DPD. |
| 4. | In the absence of a legal agreement to secure contributions towards the demand for school places arising from the development, the proposal fails to satisfactorily mitigate the infrastructure impact of the development, contrary to the provisions of Policies DC29 and DC72 of the and Policy 8.2 of the London Plan. |
| 5. | Statement Required by Article 35 (2) of the Town and Country Planning (Development Management Procedure) (England) Order 2015: During consideration by the committee, members placed different weight on the planning merits and decided to refuse planning permission. |
