| No. | Condition Text |
|---|
| 1. | The proposed first floor side/rear extension, by reason of its excessive scale, bulk, mass, roof design and lack of subservience would appear as an unacceptably dominant and visually intrusive feature in the street scene and rear garden environment harmful to the visual amenity of the surrounding area contrary to Policy 26 of the Havering Local Plan, D4 of the London Plan and the Residential Extensions and Alterations Supplementary Planning Documents. |
| 2. | The proposed first floor side/rear extension would, by reason of its depth, height and position close to the boundaries of the site, be an intrusive and unneighbourly development as well as having an adverse effect on the amenities of adjacent neighbours contrary to Policies 7 and 26 of the Havering Local Plan and the Residential Extensions and Alterations Supplementary Planning Document. |
| 3. | The proposed development, by reason of its position and proximity of the first floor flank window and juliette balcony to the neighbouring properties at Nos. 11 & 11A Whitmore Avenue, Romford would cause perceived/overlooking and loss of privacy which would have a serious and adverse effect on the living conditions of adjacent occupiers, contrary to Policies 7 and 26 of the Havering Local Plan and the Residential Extensions and Alterations Supplementary Planning Document. |
| 4. | Statement Required by Article 35 (2) of the Town and Country Planning (Development Management Procedure) (England) Order 2015: Consideration was given to seeking amendments, but given conflict with adopted planning policy, notification of intended refusal and the reason(s) for it was given to Miss Liu (Applicant) by e-mail on 08/07/24. |
