| No. | Condition Text |
|---|
| 1. | The proposed loft conversion, including the hip to gable roof and large dormer window, would, by reason of its excessive width, bulk and mass represent an unsatisfactory design solution which would unbalance the appearance of this pair of semi-detached properties and would appear unacceptably dominant and visually intrusive in the street scene and rear garden environment. The proposed development is therefore considered harmful to the character and appearance of the surrounding area, contrary to the Residential Extensions and Alterations Supplementary Planning Document and Policy DC61 of the LDF Core Strategy and Development Control Policies Development Plan Document. |
| 2. | The proposed single storey rear extension, by reason of its excessive depth, scale, bulk and mass, would constitute a disproportionate addition to this dwelling and appear as an unacceptably dominant and visually intrusive feature in the rear garden scene, harmful to the character and appearance of the surrounding area, contrary to the Residential Extension and Alteration Supplementary Planning Document and Policy DC61 of the LDF Core Strategy and Development Control Policies Development Plan Document. |
| 3. | The proposed rear extension would, by reason of its excessive depth and position close to the boundaries of the site, be an intrusive and unneighbourly development, detrimental to the amenity of adjacent occupiers, contrary to the Residential Extensions and Alterations Supplementary Planning Document and Policy DC61 of the LDF Core Strategy and Development Control Policies Development Plan Document. |
| 4. | Statement Required by Article 35 (2) of the Town and Country Planning (Development Management Procedure) (England) Order 2015: Consideration was given to seeking amendments, but given conflict with adopted planning policy, notification of intended refusal and the reason(s) for it was given to Mr Long (Agent) by phone on 21/06/16. |
