| No. | Condition Text |
|---|
| 1. | The proposed rear extension would, by reason of its height, bulk and mass, appear as an unacceptably dominant and visually intrusive feature in the streetscene and rear garden scene harmful to the appearance of the surrounding area. Additionally by reason of the proposals excessive depth, height and position close to the boundaries of the site, be an intrusive and unneighbourly development as well as having an adverse effect on the amenities of adjacent occupiers contrary to Policy DC61 of the LDF Core Strategy and Development Control Policies DPD. |
| 2. | The proposed dormer would, by reason of its height, position and bulk appear out of scale and character with the dwelling and materially harmful to the visual amenity of the surrounding area contrary to Policy DC69 and DC61. |
| 3. | The proposed development would, by reason of its design and appearance, result in unsympathetic, visually intrusive development which would not preserve or enhance the special character of this part of the Gidea Park Special Character Area contrary to Policies DC69 |
| 4. | Statement Required by Article 35 (2) of the Town and Country Planning (Development Management Procedure) (England) Order 2015: Consideration was given to seeking amendments, but given conflict with adopted planning policy, notification of intended refusal and the reason(s) for it was given to Neil McQuire, via email on 24/07/2018. |
