| No. | Condition Text |
|---|
| 1. | Based on the level of details submitted with the application, the applicant has failed to demonstrate the need of the proposal, and that the development by virtue of its use and scale including proposed occupancy/levels of staffing would not be at odds with the suburban nature of its surroundings and would not result in undue harm to the residential amenity of neighbouring occupiers through comings and goings, turnover of staff and residents in a manner distinguishable from the use of the property as a single dwelling house. The proposals would therefore be contrary to Policies 6, 7, 24, and 34 of the Havering Local Plan 2021 and Policies H12 of the London Plan as well as the objectives of the NPPF. |
| 2. | The site at PTAL 1b is not well served by public transport. The applicant has not demonstrated that proposed use would not lead to increased comings and goings to the site over and above that of a single dwelling house and that an adequate degree of visitor and carer parking facilities would be provided. Therefore as a consequence this would result in an adverse impact on the safety and convenience of the local highway network through exacerbating pedestrian-vehicular conflict along pavements and traffic congestion within the area. As such there would be conflict with Policy 6 of the Havering Local Plan 2021, Policy T6 of the London Plan as well as the objectives of the NPPF. |
| 3. | The applicant has failed to demonstrate that the property would be suitable for the intended occupiers in terms of the standard and the level of facilities provided, and would therefore conflict with Havering Local Plan 2021 Policy 6(v). |
| 4. | Statement Required by Article 35 (2) of the Town and Country Planning (Development Management Procedure) (England) Order 2015: Consideration was given to seeking amendments, but given conflict with adopted planning policy, it was necessary to issue a decision as close to the statutory timeframe as possible as opposed to seeking amendments which would have significantly delayed the application. |