| No. | Condition Text |
|---|
| 1. | The proposed roof alterations and extensions would, by reason of its height, bulk, mass and design appear unbalanced with the design of the adjoining property and create a visually intrusive feature in the street/garden scene harmful to the visual amenities of the surrounding area contrary to Policy DC61 of the LDF Core Strategy and Development Control Policies DPD. |
| 2. | The proposed rear conservatory would, by reason of its excessive depth, height and position close to the boundaries of the site, be an intrusive and unneighbourly development harming the amenities of the neighbouring occupants at No.27 Kent Drive, contrary to Policy DC61 of the LDF Core Strategy and Development Control Policies DPD. |
| 3. | The applicant is advised that the poor quality of the submitted plans has not aided consideration of this application. |
| 4. | Statement Required by Article 31 (cc) of the Town and Country Planning (Development Management) Order 2010: Consideration was given to seeking amendments, but given conflict with adopted planning policy, notification of intended refusal, rather than negotiation, was in this case appropriate in accordance with para 186-187 of the National Planning Policy Framework 2012. |
