| No. | Condition Text |
|---|
| 1. | The proposed roof form by reason of its excessive scale, bulk and mass would appear as an unacceptably dominant and visually intrusive feature in the street scene and rear garden environment harmful to the appearance of the surrounding area contrary to Policy 26 of the Havering Local Plan, D4 of the London Plan, Emerson Park Policy Area and the Residential Extensions and Alterations Supplementary Planning Documents. |
| 2. | The cumulative impact of the existing dwelling and proposed development with its position close to the boundary of the site would harm outlook, provide a loss of light and appear dominant as well as being an intrusive and un-neighbourly development, which would have an adverse effect on the amenity of adjacent neighbours contrary to the Residential Extensions and Alterations Supplementary Planning Document and Policies 7 and 26 of the Local Plan. |
| 3. | Re-submission of any further applications Informative
The plans should be revised to ensure that there is no encroachment onto the neighbouring land or clarity should be provided as outlined within the staff comments of the report. In addition, it is advised to seek pre-application advice on the revised design prior to submitting a further planning application.
A tree statement due to position of the neighbouring preserved tree within neighbouring land along the boundary. |
| 4. | Statement Required by Article 35 (2) of the Town and Country Planning (Development Management Procedure) (England) Order 2015: Consideration was given to seeking amendments, but given conflict with adopted planning policy, notification of intended refusal and the reason(s) for it was given to Mr Breden (Agent) by e-mail on 06-07-23. |
