| No. | Condition Text |
|---|
| 1. | The proposed development would, by reason of its prominent rear garden location, height, bulk and mass, and proximity to neighbouring garden boundaries appear as an unacceptably dominant and visually intrusive feature in the rear garden setting which would be harmful to the appearance of the surrounding area contrary to Policy DC61 of the LDF Core Strategy and Development Control Policies DPD. |
| 2. | The proposed development would, by reason of its bulk, orientation and siting close to the boundaries, adversely impact the amenity of neighbouring properties by way of loss of privacy and harm to outlook by way of building bulk in the rear garden environment. In addition, the proposed flat building incorporates a communal amenity space which resulting in an interface with habitable room windows of the ground floor flats that will compromise the amenity of future residents by way of loss of privacy, noise and disturbance. On this basis the amenity impacts of the proposal are contrary to Policy DC61 of the LDF Core Strategy and Development Control Policies DPD, Residential Design SPD and the London Plan. |
| 3. | The proposal fails to provide a tree survey to identify trees of value that are capable of being retained which bring amenity value and contribute to the character of the area. Due to the lack of information the LPA is unable to determine the acceptably of the proposal and the impacts of the development with respect to Policy DC 61 of the LDF Core Strategy and Development Control Policies DPD. |
| 4. | The proposal, if granted planning permission on appeal, would be liable for the Mayor of London and Havering Community Infrastructure Levy (CIL). Based upon the information supplied with the application, the CIL payable would be £12,625 for Mayoral CIL and £63,125 for Havering CIL. Further details with regard to CIL are available from the Council's website. |
