| No. | Condition Text |
|---|
| 1. | The proposed rear dormer by reason of its width, bulk and mass would not appear suitably subservient to the scale of the existing dwelling and it would appear as a dominant and bulky feature in the immediate rear garden area contrary to Policies 7 and 26 of the Havering Local Plan and the Council's Residential Extensions and Alterations Supplementary Planning Document. |
| 2. | The proposed single storey rear extension would, by reason of its positioning, depth and proximity to the shared boundary with no.178 Lyndhurst Drive, be an intrusive, overbearing and unneighbourly development that would have a significant adverse effect on the amenities of these adjacent occupiers resulting in an increased sense of enclosure with an overbearing impact as well as loss of outlook contrary to Policy 7 of the Havering Local Plan and the Residential Extensions and Alterations Supplementary Planning Document. |
| 3. | Statement Required by Article 35 (2) of the Town and Country Planning (Development Management Procedure) (England) Order 2015: Consideration was given to seeking amendments, but given conflict with adopted planning policy, it was necessary to issue a decision as close to the statutory timeframe as possible as opposed to seeking amendments which would have significantly delayed the application. |
