| No. | Condition Text |
|---|
| 1. | The development would provide substandard amenity space contrary to Policy BP5 (External Amenity Space) of the Barking and Dagenham Development Plan Document, Policy DC61 (Urban Design) of the Havering Development Plan Document and teh London Borough of Havering Residential Design SPD. |
| 2. | The proposed bungalow would be an incongruous and prominent addition to the streetscene contrary to Policy DC61 (Urban Design) of the Havering Development Plan Document and Policy BP11 (Urban Design)of the Barking and Dagenham Development Plan Document. |
| 3. | The proposed development would result in an unacceptable loss of privacy to neighbouring occupiers contrary to Policy DC61 (Urban Design) of the Havering Development Plan Document and Policy BP11 (Urban Design) of the Barking and Dagenham Development Plan Document. |
| 4. | The proposed parking space would be cramped and as a result inaccessible resulting in inadequate provision of off-street parking, contrary to Policy DC61 (Urban Design) of the Havering Development Plan Document and Policy BP11 (Urban Design) of the Barking and Dagenham Development Plan Document. |
| 5. | In the absence of a legal agreement to secure contributions towards the demand for school places arising from the development, the proposal fails to satisfactorily mitigate the infrastructure impact of the development, contrary to the provisions of Policy DC72 of the Development Control Policies DPD and Policy 8.2 of the London Plan. |
| 6. | The proposal, if granted planning permission on appeal, would be liable for the Mayor of London Community Infrastructure Levy (CIL). Based upon the information supplied with the application, the CIL payable would be £1,640. Further details with regard to CIL are available from the Council's website. |
| 7. | Statement Required by Article 35 (2) of the Town and Country Planning (Development Management Procedure) (England) Order 2015: Consideration was given to seeking amendments, but given conflict with adopted planning policy, notification of intended refusal and the reason(s) for it was given to Mr D Middleton by email on 29 July 2015. |
| 8. | The applicant is reminded that a part of the site falls within the London Borough of Barking and Dagenham and to obtain a complete and comprehensive decision a duplicate application for the proposal must be made to that Borough. It is understood that such an application was made to the London Borough of Barking and Dagenham (application 15/00802/FUL) but is currently invalid pending the submission of further information by the applicant. |
