| No. | Condition Text |
|---|---|
| 1. | The proposed front extension, by reason of its bulk, mass and lack of uniformity would appear as an unacceptably discordant, disrupt the visual rhythm of the street and look out of place, resulting in a visually intrusive feature in the street scene harmful to the appearance of the property and the surrounding area contrary to Residential Extensions and Alterations Supplementary Planning Document and Policy DC61 of the LDF Core Strategy and Development Control Policies DPD. |
| 2. | Statement Required by Article 35 (2) of the Town and Country Planning (Development Management Procedure) (England) Order 2015: In accordance with para 186-187 of the National Planning Policy Framework 2012, improvements required to make the proposal acceptable were negotiated with Mr Meyer (Agent) by phone on the 30/06/17. The revisions involved providing the front extension which is in characteristic with the other porches/front extensions within the street. The applicant was unable to make the suggested revisions due to facilities required. |
