| No. | Condition Text |
|---|
| 1. | The proposed development would, by reason of its height, bulk and mass, appear as an unacceptably dominant and visually intrusive feature in the streetscene and rear garden environments harmful to the appearance of the surrounding area and in contrast to established local character therefore contrary to Policy DC61 of the LDF Core Strategy and Development Control Policies DPD. |
| 2. | The proposal would by way of the cramped and confined nature of the site, arrangement of fenestration in conjunction with unsecure access arrangements result in a substandard level of living accomodation, contrary to Policy Policy DC61, DC4 of the LDF Core Strategy Development Control Policies DPD, Residential Design SPD and Policy 3.5 (Table 3.3) of the London Plan. |
| 3. | The proposed development would, by reason of the inadequate provision of amenity space, result in a cramped over-development of the site to the detriment of future occupiers contrary to Policy Policy DC61 of the LDF Core Strategy and Development Control Policies DPD and the Residential Design SPD. |
| 4. | The proposed development would, by reason of the inadequate on site car parking provision result in an unacceptable overspill onto the adjoining roads to the detriment of highway safety and residential amenity and contrary to Policy DC33 of the LDF Core Strategy and Development Control Policies DPD and the Residential Design SPD. |
| 5. | In the absence of a mechanism to secure a planning obligation towards the infrastructure costs of new development the proposal is contrary to the provisions of Policy DC72 of the LDF Core Strategy and Development Control Policies DPD. |
| 6. | Statement Required by Article 35 (2) of the Town and Country Planning (Development Management Procedure) (England) Order 2015: Consideration was given to seeking amendments, but given conflict with adopted planning policy, notification of intended refusal and the reason(s) for it was given to the agent in writing 13-07-2017. |
| 7. | The proposal, if granted planning permission on appeal, would be liable for the Mayor of London Community Infrastructure Levy (CIL). Based upon the information supplied with the application, the CIL payable would be £3600. Further details with regard to CIL are available from the Council's website. |