| No. | Condition Text |
|---|---|
| 1. | The proposal would, by reason of its excessive width and lack of set back from the existing front elevation, result in a dominant and visual intrusive extension detrimental to the character and appearance of the host property and visual amenity of the locality contrary to Policy DC61 of the LDF Core Strategy and Development Control Policies DPD. |
| 2. | Statement Required by Article 35 (2) of the Town and Country Planning (Development Management Procedure) (England) Order 2015: Consideration was given to seeking amendments, but given conflict with adopted planning policy, notification of intended refusal and the reason(s) for it was given to the agent by email on 25th June 2021. |
