| No. | Condition Text |
|---|
| 1. | The proposed development would, by reason of its excessive width, scale,bulk, mass conflicting roof forms and cramped appearance would unacceptably unbalance the appearance of this pair of semi-detached house and appear as a dominant and visually intrusive feature in the street scene and rear garden, harmful to the appearance of the surrounding area contrary Policy DC61 of the LDF Core Strategy and Development Control Policies Development Plan Document, the Residential Extensions and Alterations Supplementary Planning Document and Policy 7.4 of the London Plan. |
| 2. | The proposed two storey side/rear extension would by reason of its excessive depth, height and position close to the boundaries of the site, be an intrusive and unneighbourly development as well as having an adverse effect on the amenities of adjacent occupiers at Ivey Villas, Romford contrary Policy DC61 of the LDF Core Strategy and Development Control Policies Development Plan Document, the Residential Extensions and Alterations Supplementary Planning Document. |
| 3. | Statement Required by Article 35 (2) of the Town and Country Planning (Development Management Procedure) (England) Order 2015: Consideration was given to seeking amendments, but given conflict with adopted planning policy, notification of intended refusal and the reason(s) for it was given to APS Design Associates Ltd. by phone on 25/07/19. |
