| No. | Condition Text |
|---|
| 1. | The proposed detached bungalow element of the development would, by reason of its prominent rear garden location, height, bulk and mass, appear as an incongruous and unacceptably dominant, overbearing and visually intrusive feature in the rear garden setting which would be harmful to the appearance of the surrounding area contrary to Policy DC61 of the LDF Core Strategy and Development Control Policies DPD. |
| 2. | The proposal would form a cramped over-development of the site introducing excessive amounts of hardstanding and development into the rear garden environment. The scheme would also severely hinder the rear amenity space for the front pair of dwellings. Consequently the proposed rear bungalow would result in an awkward and jarring visual relationship to the neighbouring properties and would be harmful to the character and appearance of the rear garden environment contrary to Policy DC61 of the LDF Core Strategy and Development Control Policies DPD. |
| 3. | In the absence of a legal agreement to secure contributions towards the demand for school places arising from the development, the proposal fails to satisfactorily mitigate the infrastructure impact of the development, contrary to the provisions of Policies DC29 and DC72 of the Development Control Policies DPD and Policy 8.2 of the London Plan. |
| 4. | Statement Required by Article 35 (2) of the Town and Country Planning (Development Management Procedure) (England) Order 2015: Consideration was given to seeking amendments, but given conflict with adopted planning policy, notification of intended refusal and the reasons for it was given to the agent Ian Coward on 14/7/16 via email. |
| 5. | The proposal, if granted planning permission on appeal, would be liable for the Mayor of London Community Infrastructure Levy (CIL). Based upon the information supplied with the application, the CIL payable would be £4540.00. Further details with regard to CIL are available from the Council's website. |
