| No. | Condition Text |
|---|
| 1. | The proposed layout of the development would be inadequate resulting in substandard accommodation for future residents through lack of internal space. As a result, the development represents an overdevelopment of the site, which would be detrimental to future residential amenity, contrary to Policy DC61 of the LDF Core Strategy and Development Control Policies DPD, Policy 3.5 of the London Plan (as amended) and the DCLG Technical Housing Standards. |
| 2. | The proposed development would, by reason of the inadequate on site car parking provision, result in increased parking congestion in surrounding streets, to the detriment of highway safety and residential amenity, contrary to Policies DC32, DC33 and DC61 of the Local Development Framework and the guidance contained in the National Planning Policy Framework. |
| 3. | In the absence of a legal agreement to secure contributions towards the demand for school places arising from the development, the proposal fails to satisfactorily mitigate the infrastructure impact of the development, contrary to the provisions of Policies DC29 and DC72 of the Development Control Policies DPD and Policy 8.2 of the London Plan. |
| 4. | Statement Required by Article 35 (2) of the Town and Country Planning (Development Management Procedure) (England) Order 2015: Consideration was given to seeking amendments, but given conflict with adopted planning policy, notification of intended refusal and the reason(s) for it was given to Mr Daniel Brandon via email on 20th July 2016. |
