| No. | Condition Text |
|---|
| 1. | The proposed dwellings, by reason of their roof form, scale, bulk and mass would appear as an unacceptably dominant and visually intrusive feature out of character with the prevailing pattern of development, detrimental to the visual amenity of the locality and the streetscene contrary to Policy 26 of the Havering Local Plan (2021), Policy D4 of the London Plan (2021), and the National Planning Policy Framework (NPPF). |
| 2. | The layout of the development would be inadequate resulting in substandard accommodation for future residents through insufficient floor to ceiling height of the ground floor of the dwelling and the development would therefore give rise to a poor quality residential environment, harmful to the amenities of the occupiers. As a result, the development would be contrary to Policy 7 of the Havering Local Plan and Policy D6 of the London Plan. |
| 3. | The proposed development would, by reason of the inadequate on site car parking provision, result in unacceptable overspill onto the adjoining roads to the detriment of highway safety and residential amenity and contrary to Policies 23 and 24 of the Havering Local Plan and Policies T4 and T6.1 of the London Plan. |
| 4. | There is an objection to the proposed removal of tree T1 as the revised arboricultural conclusions relating to categorisation and removal are not supported by sufficiently robust or proportionate evidence. Furthermore, given the proximity of tree T1, its protected status, and the presence of long-standing but managed structural defects, any increase in built footprint would materially intensify pressure on the tree, reduce future management flexibility, and increase conflict between the development and the retained tree. Such intensification would not represent a sustainable or arboriculturally acceptable relationship with a retained TPO tree. It has not been sufficiently demonstrated that the proposal would not impact on tree - TPO 1-23 contrary to Policy 27 of the Havering Local Plan and G7 of the London Plan. |
| 5. | Statement Required by Article 35 (2) of the Town and Country Planning (Development Management Procedure) (England) Order 2015: Consideration was given to seeking amendments, but given conflict with adopted planning policy, notification of intended refusal and the reason(s) for it was given to Zaavia Design (Agent) by e-mail on 09/01/26 & 27/03/26. |
| 6. | For Residential Development Only
Please be advised that approval of this application from 1st September 2019 (either by London Borough of Havering, or subsequently by PINS if allowed on appeal following a refusal by London Borough of Havering) will attract a liability payment of £40,350 plus indexation in Community Infrastructure Levy (CIL). This charge has been levied under s.206 of the Planning Act 2008 and includes both the Mayor of London's CIL and Havering Council's CIL.
London Borough of Havering, as CIL collecting authority, has responsibility for the collection of the Mayoral CIL, in addition to Havering's CIL, on commencement of the development.
Your proposal is subject to a CIL Liability Notice indicating a levy of £10,800 plus indexation for the application, based on the Mayoral CIL levy rate for Havering of £25/sq.m plus Havering's charging rate for residential of £125/sq.m (Zone A), and the floorspace of 269 square metres.
You are advised to visit the planning portal website where you can download the appropriate document templates.
http://www.planningportal.gov.uk/planning/applications/howtoapply/whattosubmit/cil |
