| No. | Condition Text |
|---|
| 1. | The development by reason of its housing typology, the nature of the use as a small HMO with high prospective occupancy and poor access to public transport, would result in significantly higher levels of coming / goings resulting in a detrimental impact to the amenity of nearby residents from noise and disturbance associated with the use contrary to policies DC4, DC5 and DC61 of the Havering Core Strategy Development Control Policies and Development Control Document DPD 2008. |
| 2. | The development would by reason of the level of occupancy sought and level of parking proportionate to that occupancy over a typical family dwelling house, lack of off-street provision and reliance on on-street parking would increase competition for limited on-street parking to the detriment of the amenity and comfort of surrounding neighbouring occupiers and would thereby be contrary to policies DC33 and DC61 of the Havering Core Strategy Development Control Policies and Development Control Document DPD 2008. |
| 3. | Statement Required by Article 35 (2) of the Town and Country Planning (Development Management Procedure) (England) Order 2015: Consideration was given to seeking amendments, but given conflict with adopted planning policy, it was necessary to issue a decision as close to the statutory timeframe as possible as opposed to seeking amendments which would have significantly delayed the application. |
