| No. | Condition Text |
|---|
| 1. | The proposed development would, by reason of its relationship to the existing dwelling and close proximity to the flank boundary be out of character with the surrounding area and harmful to the appearance of the streetscene contrary to Policies DC61 and DC69 of the LDF Core Strategy and Development Control Policies DPD. |
| 2. | The layout, size and position of the amenity space for the new dwelling would result in an unacceptably cramped layout and poor quality of amenity space provision which is materially harmful to the amenity of future occupiers contrary to Policy DC61 of the LDF Development Control Policies DPD and the Residential Design SPD. |
| 3. | In the absence of a legal agreement to secure contributions towards the demand for school places arising from the development, the proposal fails to satisfactorily mitigate the infrastructure impact of the development, contrary to the provisions of Policy DC72 of the Development Control Policies DPD and Policy 8.2 of the London Plan. |
| 4. | Statement Required by Article 35 (2) of the Town and Country Planning (Development Management Procedure) (England) Order 2015: In accordance with para 186-187 of the National Planning Policy Framework 2012, the agent was given the opportunity to make improvements to the scheme throughout the process. The revisions involved required the acquiring land to the rear in order to provide an acceptable layout and sufficient amenity space. An amended plan was submitted on 21/08/16, however it still conflicted with adopted planning policy. |
| 5. | The proposal, if granted planning permission on appeal, would be liable for the Mayor of London Community Infrastructure Levy (CIL). Based upon the information supplied with the application, the CIL payable would be £1760. Further details with regard to CIL are available from the Council's website. |
