OcellaWeb

No.	Condition Text
1.	The proposed rear dormer and hip to gable roof extensions would, by reason of their bulk and mass close to the boundaries of the site, appear as an unacceptably dominant and visually intrusive feature in the streetscene and rear garden environment harmful to the appearance of the host property, symmetry of this pair of semis and the prevailing pattern of development in the surrounding area contrary to Policy 7 and 26 of the Havering Local Plan and the Residential Extensions and Alterations Supplementary Planning Document.
2.	Statement Required by Article 35 (2) of the Town and Country Planning (Development Management Procedure) (England) Order 2015: Consideration was given to seeking amendments, but given conflict with adopted planning policy, it was necessary to issue a decision as close to the statutory timeframe as possible as opposed to seeking amendments which would have significantly delayed the application.

No.

Condition Text

The proposed rear dormer and hip to gable roof extensions would, by reason of their bulk and mass close to the boundaries of the site, appear as an unacceptably dominant and visually intrusive feature in the streetscene and rear garden environment harmful to the appearance of the host property, symmetry of this pair of semis and the prevailing pattern of development in the surrounding area contrary to Policy 7 and 26 of the Havering Local Plan and the Residential Extensions and Alterations Supplementary Planning Document.

Statement Required by Article 35 (2) of the Town and Country Planning (Development Management Procedure) (England) Order 2015: Consideration was given to seeking amendments, but given conflict with adopted planning policy, it was necessary to issue a decision as close to the statutory timeframe as possible as opposed to seeking amendments which would have significantly delayed the application.

The London Borough Of Havering - Home page