OcellaWeb

No.	Condition Text
1.	The proposal would, by reason of its height, form, scale and mass, combined with the existing substantial extensions, lack subservience and appear incongruous, dominant and visually intrusive, harmful to the character and appearance of this heritage asset and the streetscene and would fail to preserve or enhance the Gidea Park Conservation Area contrary to Policies 26 and 28 of the adopted Havering Local Plan, the Residential Extensions and Alterations Supplementary Planning Document and the Heritage Supplementary Planning Document and the NPPF.
2.	Statement Required by Article 35 (2) of the Town and Country Planning (Development Management Procedure) (England) Order 2015: Consideration was given to seeking amendments, but given conflict with adopted planning policy, it was necessary to issue a decision as close to the statutory timeframe as possible as opposed to seeking amendments which would have significantly delayed the application.

No.

Condition Text

The proposal would, by reason of its height, form, scale and mass, combined with the existing substantial extensions, lack subservience and appear incongruous, dominant and visually intrusive, harmful to the character and appearance of this heritage asset and the streetscene and would fail to preserve or enhance the Gidea Park Conservation Area contrary to Policies 26 and 28 of the adopted Havering Local Plan, the Residential Extensions and Alterations Supplementary Planning Document and the Heritage Supplementary Planning Document and the NPPF.

Statement Required by Article 35 (2) of the Town and Country Planning (Development Management Procedure) (England) Order 2015: Consideration was given to seeking amendments, but given conflict with adopted planning policy, it was necessary to issue a decision as close to the statutory timeframe as possible as opposed to seeking amendments which would have significantly delayed the application.

The London Borough Of Havering - Home page