| No. | Condition Text |
|---|
| 1. | The proposed development would, by reason of its bulk and mass, appear as an unacceptably dominant and visually intrusive feature in the gardenscene harmful to the appearance of the site and surrounding area and harming the Garden Suburb character of the Conservation Area . By reason of its design and appearance, including use of inappropriate substantial glazed material to the single storey rear projection, the proposal is considered to be an unsympathetic form of development within the Conservation Area, failing to preserve or enhance the special character of this part of the Gidea Park Conservation Area contrary to the NPPF 2021, London Plan Policy HC1, Core Strategy Development Control Policies Development Plan Document Policies 7, 26, 27 and 28 and the Heritage Supplementary Planning Document. |
| 2. | The proposed development would give rise to development encroaching to the open rear of the site which by reason of its bulk, scale, roof design and position close to the boundaries of the site, appear unduly dominant, visually intrusive and overbearing in the rear garden environment harmful to the amenity of neighbouring properties and their rear gardens including loss of light and outlook particularly those to the east and west of the site. Further, the proposed terraces result in undue loss of privacy, harmful to residential amenity. In these respects, the proposal would be contrary to Policy 7 of the Local Plan 2021. |
| 3. | In absence of details regarding the archaeological impact of the proposals on the archaeological interest surrounding the site, it would not be possible to adequately assess the effect of the proposals on the archaeological interest and their implications on the Gidea Hall and the Fish Pond, therefore the proposals would be contrary to the NPPF 2021 and Policy HC1 of the London Plan 2021. |
| 4. | Statement Required by Article 35 (2) of the Town and Country Planning (Development Management Procedure) (England) Order 2015: In accordance with paragraph 38 of the National Planning Policy Framework 2018, the applicant via the agent was made aware of the reasons for refusal via email 04/08/2021 and further via telephone on 05/08/2021. |
| 5. | Please be advised that approval of this application from 1st September 2019 (either by London Borough of Havering, or subsequently by PINS if allowed on appeal following a refusal by London Borough of Havering) will attract a liability payment of £25,050 plus indexation in Community Infrastructure Levy (CIL). This charge has been levied under s.206 of the Planning Act 2008 and includes both the Mayor of London's CIL and Havering Council's CIL.
London Borough of Havering, as CIL collecting authority, has responsibility for the collection of the Mayoral CIL, in addition to Havering's CIL, on commencement of the development.
Your proposal is subject to a CIL Liability Notice indicating a levy of £25,050plus indexation for the application, based on the Mayoral CIL levy rate for Havering of £25/sq.m plus Havering's charging rate for residential of £125/sq.m (Zone A), and the net additional floorspace of 167 square metres.
You are advised to visit the planning portal website where you can download the appropriate document templates.
http://www.planningportal.gov.uk/planning/applications/howtoapply/whattosubmit/cil |
