| No. | Condition Text |
|---|
| 1. | The proposed development would, by reason of its height, scale, bulk, mass and siting, appear incongruous and out of character in the open and spacious rear garden environment and fail to relate to neighbouring development in the surrounding area, harmful to the character and appearance of the Gidea Park Special Character Area and contrary to Policies DC61 and DC69 of the LDF Core Strategy and Development Control Policies DPD. |
| 2. | The access road would, by reason of its position, length and proximity to neighbouring
properties, result in noise and disturbance harmful to the amenity of adjacent occupiers,
including No. 282 Main Road, contrary to Policy DC61 of the LDF Core Strategy and Development Control Policies DPD. |
| 3. | The proposed dwellings would, by reason of their height, scale, bulk, mass and siting, be an intrusive, dominant and unneighbourly development and result in a loss of amenity as well as undue overlooking and loss of privacy to No. 282 Main Road, including its rear garden, which would have a serious and adverse effect on the living conditions of adjacent occupiers, contrary to Policy DC61 of the LDF Core Strategy and Development Control Policies DPD. |
| 4. | The proposed development would, by reason of the removal of the trees protected by Tree Preservation Orders TPO 2-03 and TPO 19-71, be materially harmful to the character and amenity of the surrounding area, contrary to Policy DC60 of the LDF Core Strategy and Development Control Policies Development Plan Document and the Protection of Trees during Development Supplementary Planning Document. |
| 5. | In the absence of a legal agreement to secure contributions towards the demand for school places arising from the development, the proposal fails to satisfactorily mitigate the infrastructure impact of the development, contrary to the provisions of Policies DC29 and DC72 of the Development Control Policies DPD and Policy 8.2 of the London Plan. |
| 6. | Statement Required by Article 35 (2) of the Town and Country Planning (Development Management Procedure) (England) Order 2015: Consideration was given to seeking amendments, but given conflict with adopted planning policy, notification of intended refusal and the reason(s) for it was given to Mr Mark Breden via email on 12th July 2016. |
| 7. | The proposal, if granted planning permission on appeal, would be liable for the Mayor of London Community Infrastructure Levy (CIL). Based upon the information supplied with the application, the CIL payable would be £9,580. Further details with regard to CIL are available from the Council's website. |
