| No. | Condition Text |
|---|
| 1. | The proposed development would, by reason of its irregular and cramped design, establish a property which lacks functionality and fails to ensure the provision of adequate internal space and external amenity space. The siting of the proposed development to the rear of the commercial premises would also lead to a poor quality residential environment to the detriment of the living conditions and amenity of the property's future occupiers contrary to Policies DC55, DC61 of the LDF Core Strategy and Development Control Policies DPD, the Residential Design SPD and Policy 7.4 of the London Plan. |
| 2. | The proposed development would, by reason of its height, bulk and mass, appear as an unacceptably dominant and visually intrusive feature in the gardenscene harmful to the appearance of the surrounding area contrary to Policy DC61 of the LDF Core Strategy and Development Control Policies DPD. |
| 3. | The proposed development would, in the absence of suitable access, servicing and parking provision, result in unacceptable overspill onto the adjoining roads to the detriment of highway safety and residential amenity and contrary to Policy DC33 the LDF Core Strategy and Development Control Policies DPD and Policy 6.13 of the London Plan. |
| 4. | Statement Required by Article 35 (2) of the Town and Country Planning (Development Management Procedure) (England) Order 2015: Consideration was given to seeking amendments, but given conflict with adopted planning policy, notification of intended refusal and the reason(s) for it was given to Mr Christopher Elliott via email on 27/09/18. |
| 5. | The proposal, if granted planning permission on appeal, would be liable for the Mayor of London Community Infrastructure Levy (CIL). Based upon the information supplied with the application, the CIL payable would be £120.00. Further details with regard to CIL are available from the Council's website. |
