| No. | Condition Text |
|---|
| 1. | The proposed development would by reason of its staggered and uncharacteristic design, width of the dwelling plot, and the cramped internal layout, give rise to an unacceptably cramped development being visually obtrusive, incongruous and harmful to the character and appearance of the street scene, contrary to the aims and objectives of Policy DC61 of the Development Control Policies Development Plan Document. |
| 2. | The proposed development would, by reason of its position and proximity to neighbouring properties cause a loss of outlook which would have a serious and adverse effect on the living conditions of the adjacent occupier at No.9 Harcourt Mews, contrary to Policy DC61 of the LDF Core Strategy and Development Control Policies DPD. |
| 3. | In the absence of a mechanism to secure a planning obligation towards the infrastructure costs of new development the proposal is contrary to the provisions of the Havering Planning Obligations Supplementary Planning Document and Policy DC72 of the LDF Core Strategy and Development Control Policies DPD. |
| 4. | Statement Required by Article 31 (cc) of the Town and Country Planning (Development Management) Order 2010: Consideration was given to seeking amendments, but given conflict with adopted planning policy, notification of intended refusal, rather than negotiation, was in this case appropriate in accordance with para 186-187 of the National Planning Policy Framework 2012. |
| 5. | The proposal, if granted planning permission on appeal, would be liable for the Mayor of London Community Infrastructure Levy (CIL). Based upon the information supplied with the application, the CIL payable would be £1020. Further details with regard to CIL are available from the Council's website. |
