| No. | Condition Text |
|---|
| 1. | The proposed dwelling would, by reason of its height, scale, bulk and siting, appear incongruous and out of character in the open and spacious rear garden environment, which is characterised by undeveloped rear gardens of properties in Wigton Road and Chudleigh Road. As a result the proposed development would be harmful to the character and appearance of the surrounding area and contrary to Policy DC61 of the LDF Core Strategy and Development Control Policies DPD. |
| 2. | The proposed layout of the development would be inadequate resulting in substandard accommodation for future residents through lack of internal space, poor outlook and limited light. As a result, the development represents an overdevelopment of the site contrary to Policy DC61 of the LDF Core Strategy and Development Control Policies DPD, the Technical Housing Standards, the Housing Standards Minor Alterations to the London Plan, Policy 3.5 of the London Plan and the Housing SPG 2016. |
| 3. | The proposal, by reason of the creation of one, two bedroom residential unit combined with no off street car parking provision for the proposed and donor properties, would result in increased parking congestion in surrounding streets, contrary to Policy DC33 of the Local Development Framework and the guidance contained in the National Planning Policy Framework. |
| 4. | In the absence of a legal agreement to secure contributions towards the demand for school places arising from the development, the proposal fails to satisfactorily mitigate the infrastructure impact of the development, contrary to the provisions of Policies DC29 and DC72 of the Development Control Policies DPD and Policy 8.2 of the London Plan. |
| 5. | Statement Required by Article 35 (2) of the Town and Country Planning (Development Management Procedure) (England) Order 2015: Consideration was given to seeking amendments, but given conflict with adopted planning policy, notification of intended refusal and the reason(s) for it was given to Mr Jones via email on 14th November 2017. |
| 6. | The proposal, if granted planning permission on appeal, would be liable for the Mayor of London Community Infrastructure Levy (CIL). Based upon the information supplied with the application, the CIL payable would be £740.00. Further details with regard to CIL are available from the Council's website. |
